{"id":203,"date":"2020-12-09T12:50:18","date_gmt":"2020-12-09T17:50:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/?page_id=203"},"modified":"2023-11-24T16:13:08","modified_gmt":"2023-11-24T21:13:08","slug":"liquid-jets","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/liquid-jets\/","title":{"rendered":"Liquid Jet &amp; Two-Phase Nozzle Flow"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%;height: 1593px\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 70px\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;height: 70px\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Liquid jets have been studied for applications arising from two distinct industries. The first application targets an efficient atomization and the second searches for an efficient energy transfer via high-speed collimated liquid jets.\u00a0 The latter has been the focus of our study in this field. Motivated by its applications in the hydroentangling process (a process by which a nonwoven fabric can be produced from a loosely bonded web of fibers), we studied the impact of nozzle geometry on the breakup length of the resulting jets.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 323px\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;height: 323px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-221\" src=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Coneup-600x539.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"245\" height=\"220\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Coneup-600x539.png 600w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Coneup-890x800.png 890w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Coneup-768x690.png 768w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Coneup.png 1207w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 245px) 100vw, 245px\" \/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-222\" src=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown-600x522.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"253\" height=\"220\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown-600x522.png 600w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown-920x800.png 920w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown-768x668.png 768w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown.png 1257w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 253px) 100vw, 253px\" \/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-233 alignnone\" src=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Breakuplength-1-600x395.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"228\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Breakuplength-1-600x395.png 600w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Breakuplength-1-768x506.png 768w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Breakuplength-1.png 1062w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 228px) 100vw, 228px\" \/><br \/>\n<em><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">The jet images in the figure to the left show waterjets issued from a convergent nozzle, with inlet and outlet diameters of 350 \u00b5m and 120 \u00b5m, respectively, and a length of 1 mm,\u00a0 at different Reynolds numbers. The jet images in the middle figure show the same results but when the nozzle was inverted (used as a divergent nozzle). Surprisingly, a much longer breakup length can be seen from the jets issued from the divergent nozzle [Begenir et al. 2004]. This effect is schematically shown in the figure to the right.<\/span><\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 70px\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;height: 70px\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Our numerical simulations revealed that sharp-corner divergent nozzles (like the one used in the above experiment) promote flow detachment. The waterjet resulted from a detached nozzle flow is enveloped by a layer of downstream air is therefore protected against wall-induced instabilities (the main cause of jet breakup). Such constricted waterjets tend to remain intact as can be seen in the above experimental images. The waterjets issued from the convergent nozzle tend to atomize fairly quickly due to extensive cavitation and other wall-induced instabilities.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 330px\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;height: 330px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-239\" src=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown-Vectors-452x600.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"189\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown-Vectors-452x600.png 452w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown-Vectors-603x800.png 603w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Conedown-Vectors.png 733w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 189px) 100vw, 189px\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-242\" src=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/cavitation-1-600x249.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"207\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/cavitation-1-600x249.png 600w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/cavitation-1-1200x498.png 1200w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/cavitation-1-768x318.png 768w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/cavitation-1-1536x637.png 1536w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/cavitation-1-2048x849.png 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><em>The vector plot figure shows the velocity field inside a divergent nozzle. The downward and upward vectors show water and air, respectively. The colorful contour plots show the mixture density (red to blue represent density varying from 1000 to 1 kg\/m^3) [Tafreshi and Pourdeyhimi 2004].<\/em>\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/CavitatingWaterjet.mp4\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">Video 1: Effects of Nozzle Cavitation on Waterjet Stability<\/span><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Hydraulic-Flip1.mp4\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">Video 2: Nozzle Cavitation Resulting in a Hydraulic Flip Producing a Constricted Waterjet<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Hydraulic-Flip2.mp4\">Video 3: Hydraulic Flip, Magnified View<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 70px\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;height: 70px\"><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Waterjet breakup is traditionally considered to follow the Ohnesorge classification. In this classification, high-Reynolds number waterjets are expected to atomize quickly after discharge. Our computational-experimental studies revealed, for the first time, that a constricted waterjet (i.e., a waterjet resulted from a detached flow), does not follow the Ohnesorge classification. This means that flow detachment inside the nozzle can move the jet-to-spray transition point further downstream of the nozzle or to higher pressures.\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 447px\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;height: 447px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-251\" src=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/jetbreakup-1-600x469.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"410\" height=\"321\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/jetbreakup-1-600x469.png 600w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/jetbreakup-1-1023x800.png 1023w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/jetbreakup-1-768x601.png 768w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/jetbreakup-1.png 1332w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 410px) 100vw, 410px\" \/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-253\" src=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Ohnesorge-600x530.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"320\" height=\"283\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Ohnesorge-600x530.png 600w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Ohnesorge-906x800.png 906w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Ohnesorge-768x678.png 768w, https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2020\/12\/Ohnesorge.png 1184w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 320px) 100vw, 320px\" \/><br \/>\n<em><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">A constricted waterjet issued from a divergent nozzle (the jet to the left) is compared to its atomizing counterpart issued from the same nozzle when inverted (the jet to the right) at a Reynolds number of about 30,000. High-speed images are added tp better illustrate the wind-induced and atomizing structures of these jets. The above constricted jet is the 2nd wind-induced regime, in contrast to the predictions of the well-known classification of Ohnesorge, expecting an atomizing jet at such a high Reynolds number [Tafreshi and Pourdeyhimi 2003].<\/span><\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 186px\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;height: 186px\"><strong>Representative Publications:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: square\">\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">H.V. Tafreshi and B. Pourdeyhimi, Effects of Nozzle Geometry on Waterjet Breakup at High Reynolds Numbers, <strong><em>Experiments in Fluids<\/em><\/strong> 35(4), 364 (2003)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">Begenir, H.V. Tafreshi, and B. Pourdeyhimi, Effects of the Nozzle Geometry on Hydroentangling Waterjets: Experimental Study, <strong><em>Textile Research Journal<\/em> <\/strong>74(2), 178 (2004)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">H.V. Tafreshi and B. Pourdeyhimi, Simulation of Cavitation and Hydraulic Flip inside Hydroentangling Nozzles, <strong><em>Textile Research Journal<\/em><\/strong>\u00a074(4), 359 (2004)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">N. Anantharamaiah, H.V. Tafreshi, and B. Pourdeyhimi, Predicting Inlet Roundness of Hydroentangling Nozzles via CFD Simulations, <strong><em>Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering<\/em><\/strong> 17(5), N31 (2007)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/publications\/\">Click here for a more complete list of publications<\/a><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 97px\">\n<td style=\"width: 100%;height: 97px\"><strong>Acknowledgement:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 10pt\">The Nonwovens Institute.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Liquid jets have been studied for applications arising from two distinct industries. The first application targets an efficient atomization and the second searches for&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":394,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-203","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/394"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/203\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1128,"href":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/203\/revisions\/1128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mae.ncsu.edu\/pmmf\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}